March 1970 — A massive metallic disc reportedly hovers atop a television transmitting tower on the outskirts of Florence, South Carolina, as an unnamed witness stands beneath it at approximately 50 feet. The craft allegedly followed the witness's car for more than four hours. Anonymous account; classified Insufficient Data.
THINK ABOUTIT UFO|UAP SIGHTING REPORT
1970: Daytime Sighting in Florence, South Carolina
In March 1970, an unnamed witness and a companion identified only as “Mr. Fields” watched a massive metallic disc — estimated at 100 feet across and 25 feet tall, ringed with square-shaped green, purple, and yellow lights — hover directly over a television transmitting tower on the outskirts of Florence, South Carolina, follow their car at 40 feet altitude for miles along Interstate 95 and Highway 52, and allow the primary witness to stand directly beneath it at a distance of approximately 50 feet for more than an hour, twice, across a four-hour encounter that stretched from dusk to nearly 10:30 p.m. The craft produced no wind, no static charge, no electromagnetic interference with the vehicle, and no physiological effects on the witness — and then tilted its edge skyward, accelerated to what the witness described as blinding speed, and disappeared into space.
Date: March 1970 (exact date not specified)
Sighting Time: Approximately 6:30 p.m., continuing until approximately 10:30 p.m.
Day/Night: Dusk through full night
Location: Florence, South Carolina — near a TV transmitting tower, then along Interstate 95, Highway 52, and the Darlington bypass toward Hartsville, SC
Urban or Rural: Suburban to rural — highway corridor on the outskirts of Florence and Darlington, SC
No. of Entity(‘s): None observed (witness stated he did not see the occupants)
Entity Type: Not Applicable
Entity Description: Not Applicable
Hynek Classification: CE-I (Close Encounter of the First Kind) — Object reportedly observed at approximately 50 feet overhead, with structural detail visible
Duration: More than 4 hours
No. of Object(s): 1
Description of Object(s): Metallic, round disc with a round cupola on top; square-shaped lights completely around the edge that appeared to rotate faster as the craft accelerated; approximately 100 feet across and 25 feet tall
Shape of Object(s): Round disc with domed cupola
Size of Object(s): Approximately 100 feet across and 25 feet tall
Color of Object(s): Metallic body; square perimeter lights in green, purple, and yellow that rotated with increasing speed during acceleration
Distance to Object(s): Approximately 50 feet (directly overhead while witness stood beneath the craft); approximately 40 feet altitude during vehicle-pacing phase
Height & Speed: Hovered approximately 50 feet above the witness (stationary phases); paced vehicle at approximately 40 feet altitude along highway; departed at extreme (“blinding”) speed
Number of Witnesses: 2 (unnamed primary witness and “Mr. Fields”)
Special Features/Characteristics: Extended-duration encounter (4+ hours); witness stood directly beneath craft for approximately 1 hour on two separate occasions; no physical effects reported (no wind displacement, no static electricity, no hair standing, no EM interference with vehicle); perimeter lights appeared to rotate faster as craft accelerated; craft tilted edge upward before departure; silent departure at extreme speed with no atmospheric disturbance
Case Status: Insufficient Data
Source: UFOEvidence.org (anonymous submission)
Summary/Description: An unnamed witness and companion observed a metallic disc approximately 100 feet across hovering over a TV transmitting tower near Florence, SC. They drove beneath it, and the witness stood directly under the craft at approximately 50 feet for over an hour. The object then followed their car along I-95 and Highway 52 at 40 feet altitude. Halfway between Darlington and Hartsville, the craft hovered again while the witness stood beneath it for another 90 minutes. At approximately 10:30 p.m., the craft tilted its edge skyward and departed at extreme speed with no atmospheric displacement.
Related Cases: 1971 Florence, SC — Large Triangle | 1980 Easley, SC — Garrett Daylight Disc
Detailed Report
This account was submitted to the UFOEvidence.org database without the primary witness’s name. The only individual identified by name is a companion referred to as “Mr. Fields,” whose full identity and relationship to the witness are not specified.
According to the submission, the encounter began at approximately 6:30 p.m. on an unspecified date in March 1970, when the witness and Mr. Fields observed a round metallic craft hovering atop a television transmitting tower on the outskirts of Florence, South Carolina, near the boundary with Darlington. The craft was described as approximately 100 feet across and 25 feet tall, with a round cupola on the upper surface and square-shaped lights encircling the edge in green, purple, and yellow.
The two witnesses drove to a position directly beneath the craft. The witness provided a sketch accompanying the report showing the craft’s profile above the tower. After approximately one hour of observation from the car, the witness exited the vehicle and stood directly under the craft at a distance he estimated at 50 feet. He remained in this position for approximately one hour, around sunset. He reported no physical effects: no static electricity, no hair disturbance, no discomfort, no electromagnetic interference with the car’s instruments.
At some point, the craft moved from the tower to a position over a billboard along Interstate 95, approximately one-eighth of a mile from the transmitting tower, again at roughly 50 feet above the witness. The craft then began following the witnesses’ car as they drove from the I-95 area toward Highway 52 and south toward Darlington, maintaining an altitude of approximately 40 feet — essentially tracking directly above the vehicle.
The witnesses continued onto the Darlington bypass and the Hartsville Highway. Approximately halfway between Darlington and Hartsville, the craft stopped, and the witnesses again parked beside the road. The witness stood beneath the craft for another approximately 90 minutes, until approximately 10:30 p.m.
At that point, the craft tilted one edge slightly upward, and the witness noted that the square perimeter lights began rotating faster as the craft accelerated. The craft departed at what the witness described as blinding speed, producing no wind or atmospheric disturbance — no hair movement, no vegetation displacement. It paused briefly at altitude, then accelerated again and disappeared into the sky.
The witness explicitly stated that he did not observe the pilot or any occupants. He described the experience as “nearly a hands-on” encounter. A hand-drawn sketch accompanied the original submission showing the craft’s profile relative to the TV tower.
Researcher’s Notes
The Florence Tower Encounter — South Carolina 1970 and the Credibility Problem of Anonymous Extended Contact
- Source Chain Assessment — Anonymous and Unverifiable: This account’s most significant limitation is its anonymity. Neither the primary witness nor “Mr. Fields” is identified by full name. The submission was made to UFOEvidence.org, an open-submission database with no editorial verification process. No contemporaneous newspaper coverage from Florence or Darlington has been located, and no police or airport radar records have been associated with the event. An encounter of the claimed duration and proximity — 4+ hours, 50 feet overhead, along public highways — would be expected to generate additional witnesses, yet none are documented. The case cannot be evaluated beyond the level of an unverified personal claim.
- Behavioral Analysis — The Passivity Problem: The witness’s description raises analytical questions about the nature of the interaction. He reports standing directly beneath a massive craft for over an hour, twice, with no fear response significant enough to prompt departure. The complete absence of physical effects — no electromagnetic interference, no static charge, no wind displacement from a 100-foot object at 50 feet altitude — is either an extraordinary data point about the craft’s propulsion characteristics or an indicator that the account may not accurately represent the actual observation distance and duration. Most CE-I witnesses report some form of physical or physiological response; the complete null result described here is unusual.
- Classification and Title Correction: The existing page title references a “Daytime Sighting,” but the witness explicitly describes the initial observation beginning at 6:30 p.m. in March — which would be dusk or twilight in South Carolina — and continuing through sunset to 10:30 p.m., the majority of the encounter occurring in full darkness. The encounter is correctly categorized as a dusk-through-night event, not a daylight sighting. The CE-I classification is appropriate given the claimed 50-foot distance, though the underlying account’s reliability limits the weight that can be placed on any classification.
- Geographic Pattern — Florence, SC as a Repeat Sighting Location: Florence, South Carolina appears in this archive in connection with at least two separate UAP accounts from the early 1970s — this 1970 disc encounter and a 1971 large black triangle sighting reported by a named witness (Dennis Horne). The two events differ significantly in object description, witness credibility, and documentation quality. Shaw Air Force Base is located approximately 40 miles west of Florence, providing a potential military-aviation context for misidentification scenarios, though neither account’s description is consistent with known military aircraft of the period. The Florence corridor’s proximity to both military airspace and the I-95 transit route may contribute to its presence in the sighting record.
The 1970 Florence encounter is a striking narrative — four hours beneath a massive structured craft at near-contact distance, with a companion witness, along a traceable route. But narratives require verification, and this one provides almost none. Anonymous, uncorroborated, and unsupported by any independent documentation, it remains in the archive as a claim recorded for completeness, classified as Insufficient Data, and awaiting the independent evidence that would allow it to be taken further.
Media
Drawing by the witness. (The second image is a close-up of the craft in the drawing.)







