THINK ABOUTIT ENTITY SIGHTING REPORT

1138 CE: Mysterious ‘Dwarf’ Captured in German Monastery

In 1138 CE, monks at a German monastery discovered something in their cellar that they could not explain, could not communicate with, and ultimately could not hold. The being was small, very black in color, and spoke no language known to any of them. They tied it up. Then — perhaps out of curiosity, perhaps out of uncertainty about what they were dealing with — they loosened the rope to observe its behavior. The entity went directly back to the cellar, lifted a stone from the floor, descended into a tunnel beneath the monastery, and was gone. The tunnel was sealed with a cross. Jacques Bergier, who documented this case in his study of extraterrestrial encounters throughout history, recognized it for what it was — one of the earliest recorded physical captures of a non-human entity in the Western European record, complete with a subterranean escape route that the monks apparently had no idea existed beneath their own building.

Date: 1138

Sighting Time:  Not recorded

Day/Night:  Not recorded

Location: Germany

Urban or Rural: Rural

No. of Entity(s): 1

Entity Type:  Small non-human entity — described as a dwarf

Entity Description:    Very black in coloration; small humanoid form; spoke no language known to the monks; showed purposeful, intelligent behavior; physically capable despite captivity; demonstrated knowledge of a hidden subterranean tunnel beneath the monastery floor unknown to the monks 

Hynek Classification: CE-III (Close Encounter III) Close observation with animate beings associated with the object.

Duration:  Brief captivity — entity was held, released to observe behavior, and escaped   

Description of  Object(s):   A hidden tunnel beneath a stone floor in the monastery cellar, unknown to the monks prior to the entity’s escape — sealed afterward with a cross

Special Features / Characteristics: Physical capture of a non-human entity — one of the earliest recorded in Western Europe; entity spoke no known language; entity had prior knowledge of a hidden tunnel beneath the monastery floor unknown to its captors; monks loosened restraints deliberately to observe behavior; tunnel sealed with a cross as a permanent protective measure after the escape; subterranean access point suggests underground network or habitat

Case Status: Unexplained

Source: Jacques Bergier, Extraterrestrials Throughout History

Summary / Description: In 1138 CE monks at a German monastery captured a small, very black entity in their cellar that spoke no known language. After briefly restraining it they loosened its bonds to observe its behavior. The entity returned immediately to the cellar, lifted a floor stone, and disappeared into a hidden tunnel no monk could follow. The tunnel was sealed with a cross. Documented by Jacques Bergier, this case represents one of the earliest recorded physical captures of a non-human entity in the medieval Western European record and one of the most compelling cases for subterranean non-human habitation in the archive.
Related Cases: 1092 CE Polotsk Belarus Invisible Horsemen | 1125 CE Railbach Germany Burning Man | Subterranean Bases Archive — Underground Entity Access Points

DETAILED REPORT:

The year is 1138 CE. The monastery in question — its specific location in Germany unrecorded in the surviving source material — is a functioning religious community of the High Middle Ages. Monasteries in this era were not isolated backwaters. They were centers of learning, administration, agriculture, and record-keeping. The monks who encountered this entity were educated men, familiar with Latin and likely other languages, trained in observation and documentation, and operating within an institution that took the accurate recording of significant events seriously.

What they found in their cellar was not a man.

It was small. It was very black — described in terms that suggest an overall dark coloration rather than clothing or shadow. And when the monks attempted to communicate with it, it responded in no language any of them recognized. Not Latin. Not German. Not any tongue they could identify.

They restrained it.

What happened next tells us more about the monks than about the entity. Rather than keeping it bound, they made a deliberate decision to slacken the rope — to release enough restraint to observe what the being would do when given freedom of movement. This was not carelessness. It was curiosity. These were educated men who wanted to understand what they had captured.

The entity’s behavior was immediate and purposeful. It did not attempt to attack or flee through a door or window. It went directly back to the cellar where it had been found. And there it did something that revealed something extraordinary — it lifted a stone from the floor, exposing a tunnel beneath the monastery that the monks apparently had no knowledge of, descended into it, and was gone. No monk was able to follow.

The tunnel was sealed with a cross.

That final detail is the monks’ statement about what they believed they had encountered. In 12th-century Christian Europe, sealing a location with a cross was a formal protective act — an ecclesiastical declaration that whatever had used that passage was not to be permitted to use it again. It was the medieval equivalent of closing and locking a door that had been opened into something the community did not want opened again.

Jacques Bergier — the French chemical engineer and researcher who co-authored The Morning of the Magicians and documented this case in Extraterrestrials Throughout History — identified the 1138 German monastery account as one of the most significant pre-modern entity capture records in the European archive. The combination of physical capture, language barrier, purposeful intelligent behavior, and subterranean escape through a previously unknown access point places this case in a category that connects directly to both the CE-III entity contact record and the broader documentation of subterranean non-human activity catalogued on Subterranean Bases.

The entity knew the tunnel was there. The monks did not. Whatever the being was, it had prior knowledge of a subterranean structure beneath a building that human occupants had presumably used for years without discovering it. That knowledge implies either a previous visit, an ongoing relationship with that underground space, or access to information about the monastery’s subterranean geography that no human in the building possessed.

RESEARCHER’S NOTES: The German Monastery Dwarf — Capture, Escape, and the Tunnel the Monks Didn’t Know About

• Physical Capture Significance: The 1138 case is one of the earliest recorded physical captures of a non-human entity in the Western European historical record. Unlike distant sightings or brief encounters, this case involved restraint, observation, and sustained proximity between human witnesses and a non-human being — providing a level of detail about entity behavior, physical appearance, and cognitive function that most medieval accounts cannot match.
• The Language Barrier: The entity’s failure to speak any known language is one of the most analytically significant details in the account. The monks who encountered it were multilingual educated men. Their inability to identify the entity’s language — or its inability or refusal to use any human language — establishes a communication barrier consistent with non-human origin. The entity understood its situation well enough to exploit an escape route. The language barrier was not cognitive limitation — it was species difference.
• Prior Knowledge of the Tunnel: The entity’s direct, purposeful movement to the hidden floor stone and tunnel demonstrates prior knowledge of a subterranean feature unknown to the monastery’s human occupants. This is the most analytically compelling detail in the entire case. The entity knew where to go and how to get out. That knowledge connects this case directly to the broader pattern of non-human intelligences with access to and knowledge of underground spaces documented across the Subterranean Bases archive.
• The Cross Sealing: The monks’ decision to seal the tunnel with a cross was not superstition — it was institutional response. A monastic community sealing an access point with a religious symbol was making a formal declaration that the location was off-limits to whatever had used it. The permanence of that response — sealing rather than investigating — suggests the monks concluded that whatever was in that tunnel was beyond their authority or ability to manage, and the safest response was permanent closure.

The 1138 German monastery case sits at the intersection of two of the most significant research threads in the ThinkAboutIt network — the CE-III entity contact record and the subterranean non-human habitation archive. A small, dark, non-communicating entity captured in a monastic cellar, escaping through a tunnel the monks did not know existed, leaving behind a sealed access point and nine centuries of unanswered questions. Jacques Bergier preserved it. The archive holds it. The tunnel — wherever it led — was real enough that educated medieval men sealed it permanently and thought that was the right thing to do.