THINK ABOUTIT UFO|UAP|ENTITY ENCOUNTER REPORT

 1965: Kabul, Afghanistan Alien Encounter | The Piper’s Field Case Archive

Near Kabul, Afghanistan, in 1965, a man named Baba was woken at 4 in the morning by a strange, piping flute music. Running outside to find its source, he found two humanoid figures, each barely two feet tall, apparently carrying flute-like instruments of their own. When he moved toward them, they bolted across a field and vanished into the desert.

Date: 1965 (exact date not given in source)

Sighting Time: 4:00 AM

Day/Night: Early morning

Location: Near Kabul, Afghanistan

Urban or Rural: Desert/rural — witness ran into a field adjacent to open desert

No. of Entity(‘s): 2

Entity Type: Humanoid

Entity Description: Approximately 60 centimeters (about 2 feet) tall; both appeared to be carrying flute- or pipe-like instruments

Hynek Classification: CE-III (Close Encounter III) — retained as the closest available Hynek category, though no craft or UFO of any kind is described anywhere in the source; see Researcher’s Notes

Duration: Undocumented

No. of Object(s): 0 — no craft or object reported, only the two entities

Number of Witnesses: 1 (a man identified only as Baba)

Special Features/Characteristics: Witness was awakened specifically by strange pipe/flute-like music before seeing the entities; both entities appeared to carry similar instruments themselves; when the witness tried to approach, they fled across a field and disappeared into the desert; the case’s original English-language compiler, Albert Rosales, noted his own uncertainty about how to classify it, asking whether it might be “an unexplored abduction event”; independent cataloger Patrick Gross rates this specific case “No credibility” and “Insufficient information” in his own review

Case Status: Insufficient Data — see Researcher’s Notes for rationale

Source: LDLN #323 (Lumières Dans La Nuit, 1993); Denys Breysse, Project Bécassine; catalogued in Albert Rosales, “1965 Humanoid Sighting Reports”

Summary/Description: Near Kabul, Afghanistan, in 1965, a man named Baba was awakened at 4:00 AM by strange pipe or flute music and ran outside to find two humanoid figures, each about 60 centimeters tall, apparently carrying similar instruments. When he tried to approach, they fled across a field and vanished into the desert.

Related Cases: This archive’s 1975 Oran, Algeria case shares the same underlying source chain (Denys Breysse, Project Bécassine) and the same structural pattern — a solitary entity encounter with no associated craft. The two are otherwise unrelated incidents.

Detailed Report

This is one of the thinnest-documented cases in the archive, and its own chain of custody is worth laying out plainly. The account was first published in 1993 by French researcher Denys Breysse in the ufology magazine Lumières Dans La Nuit, under his “Project Bécassine” catalog of older humanoid reports, and was later carried into English-language ufology through Albert Rosales’ compiled “1965 Humanoid Sighting Reports.” No contemporaneous 1965 report, investigation, or named investigator is documented anywhere in that chain — only the secondhand catalog entry itself, nearly three decades after the fact.

By that account, a man named Baba, living near Kabul, Afghanistan, was woken at four in the morning by an unusual sound: a strange, piping flute or pipe music. Going outside to investigate, he found two small humanoid figures, each roughly 60 centimeters tall, who themselves appeared to be carrying flute- or pipe-like instruments. When Baba moved to approach them, the two figures fled across a nearby field and disappeared into the surrounding desert.

That’s the entirety of the account as it survives. Rosales, compiling the case for his own catalog, flagged his own uncertainty about it, wondering aloud whether it might represent “an unexplored abduction event” rather than the brief, complete sighting it appears to be as recorded. Separately, French cataloger Patrick Gross, who has independently reviewed this exact case in detail, rates it explicitly as carrying “No credibility” and being based on “Insufficient information” in his own case file — a direct assessment from a careful, specialist source, not a general impression.

RESEARCHER’S NOTES

The Piper’s Field — Afghanistan 1965 and a Case Flagged Low-Credibility by Its Own Cataloger

• Classification Notes: CE-III is retained as the closest available Hynek category, though — as with this archive’s 1975 Oran, Algeria case, drawn from the same underlying source chain — no craft or UFO of any kind is described; only two entities appear, are noticed, and flee.
• Explicit Low-Credibility Rating from an Independent Cataloger: Patrick Gross, a meticulous French case cataloger who has independently reviewed this exact report, rates it explicitly as “No credibility” and “Insufficient information” in his own case file — a direct, sourced judgment this archive preserves rather than a general impression of its own.
• Cataloger’s Own Uncertainty: Albert Rosales, who compiled the original English-language version of this case, expressed his own uncertainty about it, asking in his notes, “Could this be an unexplored abduction event?” — suggesting even the compiler was unsure whether the brief encounter as recorded captures the whole of what was reported.
• Source Chain: The case traces to a 1993 LDLN magazine article by Denys Breysse, cataloging older reports under the name “Project Bécassine,” and reached English-language ufology through Albert Rosales’ compilations. No independent investigation, contemporaneous report, or corroborating witness is documented anywhere in the chain.
• Case Status Rationale: Filed as Insufficient Data given the single, uncorroborated witness, the absence of any associated craft despite the CE-III label, and the explicit low-credibility and insufficient-information ratings applied to this specific case by an independent, careful cataloger.

The Kabul case survives as little more than a secondhand paragraph — a strange music, two small fleeing figures, and a desert that swallowed them. It’s filed as Insufficient Data not as a dismissal, but because the most careful independent reviewer of this exact report says plainly that there isn’t enough here to weigh it any other way.

A strange “pipe” music.